Beyond data and sustainability regulations

In an era of regulatory flux, corporations must remember that sustainability isn't just about paperwork—it's about meaningful impact. Recent policy shifts have prioritized economic expediency over environmental transparency, but the fundamental business case for climate action remains stronger than ever.

The Shifting Regulatory Landscape

In February 2025, the European Commission proposed its first Omnibus package of sustainability rules, aiming to significantly reduce EU sustainability reporting requirements (World Economic Forum, 2025). This sweeping reform removes approximately 80% of companies from the scope of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), limiting application to only the largest companies with over 1,000 employees and specific financial thresholds (ESG Today, 2025a). The package also postpones reporting deadlines by two years for many businesses and eliminates sector-specific reporting standards (Accountancy Europe, 2025).

While presented as a measure to reduce administrative burdens and boost competitiveness, the rollback has sparked concerns about transparency and potential setbacks in sustainability momentum (Green Central Banking, 2025). European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that "the content of the laws is good, we want to maintain it and we will maintain it. But the way we get there, the questions we're asking, the data points we're collecting is too much, often redundant and often overlapping" (Sustainability Magazine, 2025).

Meanwhile, in the United States, the political landscape for sustainability has shifted dramatically under the second Trump administration. Within days of taking office in January 2025, President Trump issued a series of executive orders targeting environmental regulations and climate initiatives (Ropes & Gray, 2025). The administration has withdrawn from the Paris Climate Agreement, halted the SEC's climate disclosure rules, and begun dismantling various Biden-era ESG-related policies (World Resources Institute, 2025). An executive order aimed at "unleashing American energy" specifically prioritized identifying state laws related to climate change, ESG initiatives, and carbon emissions for potential legal challenges (Holland & Knight, 2025).

Additionally, investors withdrew $6.1 billion from ESG funds in the first quarter of 2025 alone, reflecting what analysts describe as an intensifying backlash fueled by the administration's anti-climate agenda and policies targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives (CNBC, 2025).

Voluntary Frameworks: The Foundation of Corporate Sustainability

It's crucial to remember that corporate sustainability reporting existed long before government mandates. Organizations like the (then) Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), established in 2000, and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), formed in 2011, created robust frameworks for voluntary environmental, social, and governance disclosures (APIday, 2023).

These voluntary frameworks arose from market demand, not regulatory pressure. Investors, customers, and other stakeholders increasingly sought information about companies' environmental and social impacts. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), one of the most widely used frameworks globally, has been adopted by over 10,000 reporters in more than 100 countries, demonstrating the significant value businesses find in sustainability disclosure regardless of legal requirements (Ecoonline, 2024).

Each framework serves a specific purpose:

• CDP focuses on environmental reporting, specifically climate, water, and forestry (Carbon Trust, 2024)

• SASB provides industry-specific sustainability standards across 77 industries (Novisto, 2025)

• GRI offers a comprehensive, modular approach structured around universal, sector, and topic-specific standards (Sustainable Business Toolkit, 2025)

• The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) specifically addresses climate-related risks and opportunities (Novisto, 2025)

Companies have long used these frameworks to engage stakeholders and demonstrate their alignment with the environmental and social stewardship expected in today's business environment (Sustridge, 2023). The fact that thousands of companies voluntarily participated in these reporting schemes before any regulations were imposed demonstrates that businesses understood the inherent value proposition.

The Business Case Remains Strong

While the current political and regulatory environment may seem unfavorable to sustainability initiatives, the fundamental business case for them hasn't changed. Research consistently demonstrates that strong ESG performance correlates with financial benefits and reduced risks (SAP, n.d.).

Studies show that companies with robust ESG frameworks can secure financing at more favorable rates. According to research, investment managers are willing to pay a 10% premium for companies with positive ESG track records, with some willing to pay up to a 40% premium. This reflects investors' understanding that companies with strong sustainability practices tend to face fewer risks and possess greater resilience.

Carbon accounting and emissions reduction initiatives also drive operational improvements (IBM, 2025). By tracking and managing their greenhouse gas emissions, companies identify inefficiencies and opportunities for cost savings. Whether through reduced energy consumption, optimized transportation networks, or decreased waste, these initiatives often produce tangible financial benefits alongside environmental ones (Microsoft Sustainability).

Research from China's manufacturing sector shows that improved ESG performance significantly reduces corporate carbon emissions through several channels, including green technology innovation, enhanced corporate efficiency, and reduced managerial short-sightedness (Frontiers, 2023). These benefits are most pronounced in companies operating under strict environmental regulations, intense industry competition, and high capital intensity—suggesting that sustainability initiatives are particularly valuable in challenging business environments.

Materiality and Efficiency: The Keys to Success

Companies that successfully integrate sustainability into their operations focus on two critical elements: materiality and efficiency.

Materiality involves identifying which sustainability issues are most relevant to a specific business and industry (Ecoonline, 2024). Rather than attempting to address every possible environmental or social concern, successful companies focus their resources on the areas where they can make the most significant impact and face the greatest risks. The SASB Materiality Map is a valuable tool for this purpose, helping businesses identify the most financially material sustainability issues for their specific sector (OneTrust, n.).

Efficiency requires companies to implement sustainability initiatives in ways that enhance rather than hinder operations. This means integrating environmental considerations into existing processes, leveraging technology to automate data collection and analysis, and ensuring that sustainability efforts align with broader business objectives (Wolters Kluwer, 2024). When done correctly, efficiency-focused sustainability initiatives reduce costs, improve performance, and strengthen competitive positioning.

Many leading companies have successfully demonstrated that decarbonization efforts can create value. For example, by establishing clear emissions baselines, setting science-based targets, and implementing systematic reduction strategies, these organizations have uncovered opportunities to streamline operations, reduce resource consumption, and enhance their reputations with key stakeholders (IBM, 2025).

Navigating the Sustainability Backlash

The current regulatory rollbacks and political pushback against sustainability create significant challenges for companies committed to environmental and social responsibility. However, this period of transition also presents opportunities for organizations to refocus their efforts and strengthen their approaches (Vinson & Elkins, n.d.):

1. Focus on substance over form: With fewer mandatory reporting requirements, companies can redirect resources from compliance activities to initiatives that deliver tangible environmental and social benefits.

2. Communicate effectively: Rather than simply publishing lengthy sustainability reports, companies should focus on clearly communicating the business case for their initiatives to investors, customers, and other stakeholders.

3. Maintain voluntary disclosures: Companies that have already implemented sustainability reporting systems should continue to disclose their performance through voluntary frameworks, maintaining transparency and stakeholder trust (Reuters, 2025a).

4. Emphasize financial relevance: By highlighting the financial benefits of sustainability initiatives—such as cost savings, risk reduction, and enhanced reputation—companies can build broader internal and external support (Morgan Lewis, 2025).

5. Build resilient strategies: Rather than reacting to short-term political shifts, companies should develop sustainability strategies that can withstand regulatory changes and remain relevant across different political environments (Thomson Reuters Institute, 2024).

Conclusion: The Path Forward

Sustainability is ultimately about value creation, not just compliance. The most successful companies understand that reducing environmental impacts, strengthening social relations, and enhancing governance practices are essential components of long-term business success—regardless of the regulatory environment.

While current political trends may temporarily reduce pressure for sustainability reporting, the fundamental drivers of corporate sustainability remain intact. Climate change continues to present physical risks to operations and supply chains. Consumers increasingly make purchasing decisions based on companies' environmental and social records. Investors recognize that sustainability performance is a meaningful indicator of management quality and future prospects (Financier Worldwide, n.d.).

Companies that view the current deregulatory environment as an opportunity to abandon sustainability efforts will likely find themselves at a competitive disadvantage when policy priorities inevitably shift again. Conversely, those that maintain their commitment to environmental and social responsibility—focusing on materiality, efficiency, and value creation—will strengthen their market positions while contributing to the broader transition to a more sustainable global economy (Michigan Journal of Economics, 2025).

The path forward is clear: sustainability isn't about ticking boxes on a regulatory form—it's about fundamentally transforming business operations to thrive in a resource-constrained, climate-changed world. That imperative transcends short-term political fluctuations and remains as urgent as ever.

References

1. Accountancy Europe. (2025, March 12). Omnibus explained: key changes to CSRD. Retrieved from https://accountancyeurope.eu/publications/omnibus-explained-key-changes-to-csrd/

2. APIday. (2023, August 22). The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). Retrieved from https://www.apiday.com/glossaries-posts/sasb-what-is-sustainability-accounting-standards-board-sasb-standards

3. Carbon Trust. (2024, March 1). What are Scope 3 emissions and why do they matter? Retrieved from https://www.carbontrust.com/our-work-and-impact/guides-reports-and-tools/what-are-scope-3-emissions-and-why-do-they-matter

4. CNBC. (2025, April 28). Trump-fueled backlash 'intensified' flight from ESG funds, Morningstar finds. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/28/trump-esg-funds-backlash.html

5. Ecoonline. (2024, January 10). ESG Reporting Frameworks and Standards Differences. Retrieved from https://www.ecoonline.com/en-us/blog/esg-reporting-frameworks-and-standards-understanding-the-difference

6. ESG Today. (2025a, March 13). EU to Exempt 80% of Companies from CSRD Sustainability Reporting Requirements. Retrieved from https://www.esgtoday.com/eu-to-exempt-80-of-companies-from-csrd-sustainability-reporting-requirements/

7. ESG Today. (2025b, March 27). EU Council Approves Delay to CSRD and CSDDD Sustainability Reporting Regulations. Retrieved from https://www.esgtoday.com/eu-council-approves-delay-to-csrd-and-csddd-sustainability-reporting-regulations/

8. Financier Worldwide. (n.d.). Trump and ESG: the outlook for 2025. Retrieved from https://www.financierworldwide.com/trump-and-esg-the-outlook-for-2025

9. Frontiers. (2023, December 14). Carbon reduction effect of ESG: empirical evidence from listed manufacturing companies in China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1311777/full

10. Green Central Banking. (2025, March 13). EU omnibus sustainability proposal: why experts are concerned. Retrieved from https://greencentralbanking.com/2025/02/26/eu-sustainability-omnibus-proposal/

11. Holland & Knight. (2025, April). President Trump Issues Executive Order Targeting State Climate Programs. Retrieved from https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/04/president-trump-issues-executive-order-targeting-state

12. IBM. (2025, April). What Is Carbon Accounting? Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/carbon-accounting

13. Michigan Journal of Economics. (2025, January 10). The Future of ESG: Under the Trump Administration. Retrieved from https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mje/2025/01/10/the-future-of-esg-under-the-trump-administration/

14. Microsoft Sustainability. (n.d.). GHG Emissions Accounting & ESG Data. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/sustainability/learn/ghg-emissions-accounting-esg-data

15. Morgan Lewis. (2025, February 11). Top 5 ESG considerations for US investors under the Trump-Vance administration. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/top-5-esg-considerations-us-investors-under-trump-vance-administration-2025-02-11/

16. Normative. (2023, January 12). Carbon accounting and ESG. Retrieved from https://normative.io/insight/esg-investing-is-gold/

17. Novisto. (2025, January 6). 4 ESG Reporting Frameworks & Standards. Retrieved from https://novisto.com/resources/blogs/four-popular-esg-reporting-schemes-that-complement-each-other

18. OneTrust. (n.d.). CDP vs SASB vs GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards. Retrieved from https://www.onetrust.com/blog/cdp-sasb-gri-sustainability-reporting-standards/

19. PwC Slovakia. (n.d.). ESG reporting and preparation of a Sustainability Report. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/sk/en/environmental-social-and-corporate-governance-esg/esg-reporting.html

20. Reuters. (2025a, March 17). ESG Watch: New SEC rules under Trump turn up the heat for sustainable investors. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/esg-watch-new-sec-rules-under-trump-turn-up-heat-sustainable-investors-2025-03-17/

21. Ropes & Gray. (2025, January 24). ESG in 2025 for Legal and Compliance Professionals: Day 1 Trump Executive Orders and Memoranda – A First Look. Retrieved from https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/viewpoints/102jutq/esg-in-2025-for-legal-and-compliance-professionals-day-1-trump-executive-orders

22. SAP. (n.d.). What is ESG Reporting? A comprehensive guide. Retrieved from https://www.sap.com/resources/esg-reporting-guide

23. Sustainable Business Toolkit. (2025, January 9). Understanding ESG Frameworks: A Comprehensive Guide to Sustainable Business Reporting. Retrieved from https://www.sustainablebusinesstoolkit.com/esg-frameworks/

24. Sustainability Magazine. (2025, February 4). Deregulation: How Will the EU Omnibus Impact Sustainability? Retrieved from https://sustainabilitymag.com/articles/deregulation-how-will-the-eu-omnibus-impact-sustainability

25. Sustridge. (2023, November 24). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Frameworks and Standards. Retrieved from https://www.sustridge.com/blog-content/corporate-sustainability-reporting-frameworks-standards

26. Thomson Reuters Institute. (2024, November 26). ESG in the post-election US: Regulation shifts to states & international regulators as federal policies wither. Retrieved from https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-us/posts/esg/post-election-regulation/

27. Vinson & Elkins. (n.d.). ESG in 2025: What to Expect in Trump 2.0. Retrieved from https://www.velaw.com/insights/esg-in-2025-what-to-expect-in-trump-2-0/

28. Wolters Kluwer. (2024, September 4). The ultimate guide to carbon emissions reporting: What CFOs need to know about Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. Retrieved from https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/esg-carbon-emissions

29. World Economic Forum. (2025, March). Understanding the EU´s new Omnibus proposal and its aims. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/03/eu-omnibus-proposal-what-lies-ahead/

30. World Resources Institute. (2025). Climate Action Opportunities and Setbacks Under Trump. Retrieved from https://www.wri.org/insights/trump-climate-action-setbacks-opportunities-us